CV

Uncategorized

Duane Gundrum

 

Education

Master’s degree, communication                                         graduated December 2008

University of the Pacific                                                                             Stockton, California

Master’s degree, political science                                       graduated December 2001

Western Michigan University                                                                   Kalamazoo, Michigan

Bachelor of Arts, political science                                           Graduated APRIL 1999

San Francisco State University                                                          San Francisco, California

Associate degree of science, computer science                           Graduated MAY 1995

City College of San Francisco                                                            San Francisco, California

 

 

Honors and Awards

 

“Best of…” Fiction Award in honor of Charles Clerc from Artifact, May 2009

Stockton Arts Commission Short Story Contest, Second Place, March 2008

Stockton Arts Commission Short Story Contest, First Place, March 2007

Top Speaker Award, American Forensics Association, NCFA National Tournament, April 1999.

Top Speaker Award, Parliamentary Debate, Governor’s Cup, September 1998.

Top Speaker Award, American Forensics Association, Roadrunner Classic Tournament, October 1998.

Top Speaker Award, American Forensics Association, Roadrunner Classic Tournament, October 1997.

San Francisco State University Deans List, Fall 1997, Spring 1998, Fall 1998, Spring 1999

Merit Scholarship from American Legion, 1983.

Merit Scholarship from Bank of America for recognition in science achievement, 1983.

 

Academic and Professional Organizations

 

National Communication Association, since 2008

American Statistical Association, since 2005

American Political Science Association, since 2000

Political Science Graduate Student Association WMU, 1999-2006

publications & conferences

 

The Deck Const: Shadows & Rumors, Novel, 2014

 

A Season of Kings: Book 1 of the Tales of Reagul, Novel, 2014

 

Absent Without Leave, Novel, 2013

 

The Teddy Bear Conspiracy, Novel, 2013

 

Leader of the Losers, Novel, 2013

 

The Ameriad: The Untold Founding of America by the Survivors of Troy, Novel, 2013

 

Darkened Passages: A Collection of Dark Fantasy, Book of Short Stories, 2013

 

License to Quill, Book of Published Poetry, 2013

 

Neo-Revolutionary Messages: Russia’s August 1991 Coup, Nonfiction Book, 2011

 

“The Friendship Over Time (FOT) Model: A paradigmatic shift into a new theory of cooperation,” first author, coauthored with Kathleen Bruce, National Communications Association Peace and Conflict Division, November, 2008, San Diego, California.

 

Deadly Deceptions: A Steve Darwood Army Counterintelligence Novel, Novel, 2008

 

“(Neo) Revolutionary Messages: An analysis of the impact of counter-narratives versus state narratives during the 1991 coup d’etat in the former Soviet Union,” Thesis for master’s degree, University of the Pacific, 2008.

 

“Seen But Not Heard: An analysis of failed gender expectations observed during the August 1991 Soviet Coup,” first author, coauthored with Kathleen Bruce, Gender and Science Research Conference, Stockton, CA, 2008.

 

Destiny, Novel, 2007

 

“Why Poverty Exists,” World Issues: 360, August 2007.

 

“The Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Self-concepts on Romantic Communication over MySpace,” coauthored with Qingwen Dong and Mark Urista in CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2007.

 

“The Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Self-concepts on Romantic Communication over MySpace,” coauthored with Qingwen Dong and Mark Urista at the Midwinter Conference of AEJMC, Reno, NV, February 2007.

 

“Changing the Paradigm: Intelligence gathering and strategic/tactical level conflict,” Averting Future Security Threats Panel, MPSA Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, April 2005.

 

Thompson’s Bounty, Novel, 2005.

 

Innocent Until Proven Guilty, Novel, 2001.

 

“Credit Limits of the Gods,” Just A Moment Magazine, Winter 1993-1994.

 

“Cosmic Delusions”, Barrelhouse Magazine, Winter Issue 1992.

 

“Held Hostage by the Computer Revolution”, ComputorEdge Magazine, October 20, 1989.

 

classes taught

Speech 1315, Public Speaking, Del Mar College, Spr 18

Speech 1315, Public Speaking, Del Mar College, Spr 18 (2nd section)

Speech 1315, Public Speaking, Del Mar College, Fall 17

Speech 1315, Public Speaking, Del Mar College, Summer 17

Speech 1315, Public Speaking, Del Mar Community College, S 17

Freshman Seminar (2 sections), Wiley College, S 16

Freshman Seminar (4 sections), Wiley College, F 15

Freshman Seminar (3 sections), Wiley College, S 15

Freshman Seminar (4 sections), Wiley College, F14

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, Summer 14

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, S14

Political Science 110, American Government, Grand Rapids Community College, S14

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, F13

Political Science 110, American Government, Grand Rapids Community College, F13

Communication 131, Public Speaking, Grand Rapids Community College, S13

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, F12

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, Summer 12

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, S12

Political Science 110, American Government, Grand Rapids Community College, F 11

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, F 11

Political Science 110, American Government, Grand Rapids Community College, S 11

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, S 11

Communication 135, Interpersonal Communication, Grand Rapids Community College, F 10

Debate Instruction, Delta Academy, Seoul, South Korea, 08-09 (numerous courses)

English as a Second Language, Delta Academy, Seoul, South Korea, 08-09 (numerous courses)

English as a Second Language, EFS Institute, Fairfield, California, Sum 08

Inspector & Field Inspector Training, Registrar of Voters, Stockton, California, Sum 08

Poll Worker Training, Registrar of Voters, Stockton, California, Sum 08

Communication 27, Public Speaking, University of the Pacific, Sp 08

Communication 43, Interpersonal Communication, University of the Pacific, F 07

Communication 27, Public Speaking, University of the Pacific, Sp 07

Communication 43, Interpersonal Communication, University of the Pacific, F 06

Communication 27, Public Speaking, University of the Pacific, F 06

Communication 27, Public Speaking, University of the Pacific, F 06 (2nd section)

Political Science 100, Introduction to Political Science, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, F 05

Political Science 101, American Government, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, F 05

Political Science 100, Introduction to Political Science, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sum 05

Political Science 101, American Government, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sum 05

Political Science 250, International Relations, Western Michigan University, Sp 05

Political Science 100, Introduction to Political Science, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sp 05

Political Science 101, American Government, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sp 05

Political Science 101, American Government, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sp 05 (2nd section)

Political Science 100, Introduction to Political Science, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, F 04

Political Science 3200, American Judicial Process (TA for course), Western Michigan University, Sum 04

Political Science 3200, American Judicial Process (TA for course), Western Michigan University, Sp 04

Political Science 100, Introduction to Political Science, Kalamazoo Valley Community College, Sp 04

Political Science 3200, American Judicial Process (TA for course), Western Michigan University, F 03

 

Work Experience

Assistant Instructor of Speech                                                                           august 2016 – Present

Del Mar College                                                                                                             Corpus Christi, Texas

 

assistant director of qep                                                                               august 2014 – August 2016

Wiley College                                                                                                                            Marshall, Texas

 

Communication and political science instructor                                  August 2010 – august 2014

Grand Rapids Community College                                                                         Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

Education analyst & E-Learning designer                                    September 2009 – december 2013

Spectrum Health Hospitals                                                                                      Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

English as second language instructor                                              August 2008 – september 2009

Delta Academy                                                                                                                    Seoul, South Korea

 

English as second language instructor                                                         July 2008 – August 2008

EFS Institute                                                                                                                      Fairfield, California

 

Election training specialist                                                                                   June 2008 – July 2008

Registrar of Voters                                                                                                           Stockton, California

 

graduate assistant/instructor                                                                           august 2006 – may 2008

University of the Pacific                                                                                                  Stockton, California

 

database coordinator/data analyst                                                                 july 2005 – august 2006

Spectrum Health Hospitals                                                                                      Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

Political science instructor                                                                       august 2004 – january 2006

Kalamazoo Valley Community College                                                                      Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

opinion editor                                                                                                                july 2004 – july 2005

The Western Herald                                                                                                       Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

Graduate Associate                                                                                                 July 2003 – JULY 2004

Western Michigan University                                                                                      Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

Graduate Assistant/instructor                                                                             July 1999 – July 2003

Western Michigan University                                                                                      Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

QA Tester                                                                                                           september 1996 – July 1998

Electronic Arts                                                                                                         Redwood City, California

 

computer repair technician                                                               september 1994 – september 1996

San Francisco State University                                                                            San Francisco, California

 

Hotel investigator                                                                                  october 1988 – september 1994

San Francisco Hilton Hotel                                                                                  San Francisco, California

 

counterintelligence agent & demolitions specialist                          july 1983 – september 1988

Department of Defense                                                                                                         Washington, D.C.

 

Workshops, Training and Seminars

 

Leadership Training, US Army                                                                 July 1983 THROUGH June 1987

Specialty officer training courses throughout military career on leadership

 

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE

 

  • Assistant coach of top 10 nationally ranked speech and debate team
  • Director of a university team of 35 individuals in speech and debate
  • Experienced coaching with all types of debate and individual events
  • Created and maintained numerous types of databases, including one of the first to categorize data for the S. military in South Korea
  • Individualized training and counseling of students
  • Personal responsibility of up to 300 individuals at one time while in military environment
Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 541

The Avatar Returns to the World of Britannia (An Early Review of Shroud of the Avatar after its official release)

Business, Computer Games, , , , , , , ,
It’s amazing how this game looks so much like a visual from my every day life.

For the longest time, I was holding out on playing Shroud of the Avatar. Which is kind of strange, considering the fact that I’m exactly the type of player the game has been looking for. You see, I grew up as a programmer and gamer while playing every Ultima game ever made. If you follow the natural evolution of that series of computer games, it eventually leads directly to Shroud of the Avatar. The chances of me not playing this game were slightly lower than zero percent. Yet, it took me a number of years of the game being in development for me to finally decide to sign on. I guess that probably needs a bit of unpacking. So, let’s unpack.

As I mentioned, in the early days of computer games, Richard Garriott developed a series of games that ran under the IP of “Ultima”. It was a series of roleplaying games where you played a warrior, a mage or some semblance of fantasy classes and unlocked the secrets of the world before facing down against some huge big bad guy (or girl) and then saved all of the land. A review:

Ultima 1: You fought against an evil wizard named Mondain. But Mondain had a secret student and lover. This takes place on Sosaria.

Ultima 2: His lover’s name was Minax. You then have to defeat her. But she and Mondain secretly had a kid. Of course they did. This takes place on Earth through all sorts of time periods.

Ultima 3: The kid was kind of weird, in that Cylon kind of way. You, as expected, had to defeat him. This takes place on Sosaria.

Ultima 4: Gets weird and colorized. You spend the entire game becoming the ultimate character, an avatar. This introduces the virtues and eventually becomes the foundation for all of the Ultimas. This introduces Britannia.

Ultima 5: A bad lord under British gets corrupted by the shadowlords and basically takes over Britannia. You gotta stop him and them. Takes place in Britannia.

Ultima 6: A bunch of gargoyles get involved, creating a plot about immigration and enforcement. Or something like that. You act as an example and make everyone happy again. Much merriment is involved. Takes place in Britannia.

Ultima 7: Probably the best of the single player games. Takes place in Britannia and introduces the Guardian, who is a kind of twisted version of enlightenment. He sticks around for two more games. Takes place in Britannia.

Ultima 8: You get taken to some other place and do some stuff. To be honest, never really got into this game as I got stuck on the dock in the early part of the game, couldn’t figure out how to get out, and then just decided to play another game instead.

Ultima 9: Game becomes first person. Much more interesting world (still Britannia) but seems kind of lonely as the new perspective seems to eliminate a lot of npcs you’d normally meet. It’s the final encounter with the Guardian. Involves a Captain Kirk mind meld sort of conclusion, but should have been expected.

Ultima Online: Garriott brings the series to an online environment by making the argument that when Mondain was around, he split a shard into multiple pieces, each of which was another copy of Britannia (meaning you were on a different server). Game has lasted over twenty years now, even though Garriott has been divorced from it for most of that time.

Shroud of the Avatar: This is the eventual successor to the franchise, even though the understanding is that Electronic Arts still owns the rights to the Ultima name. It’s been pretty much understood that EA has no idea how to actually allow a franchise to breathe, so fortunately Garriott has given new life into what was once a very original idea.

So, what is Shroud supposed to be like? Well, it released officially on March 27th of this year, although it’s been in extended beta for a number of years now. Several times during the beta, the world was reset, so people had to start over, but the current beta that was playing through was allowed to survive and on March 27th, the game went from idea to actual release. Much rejoicing was had. Not much change, however, occurred. Okay, some change happened, but it was mostly patched kinds of changes without much of an impact on what was happening with the world itself.

But the story itself argues that the avatar has returned to Britannia (or Novia, or whatever land this is supposed to be now). A bunch of comets have caused problems, and there appears to be some kind of “evil” that may be under the surface. But for the most part, other than a couple of dragons wandering around and a ton of bad guys, pirates and thieves, not much seems to be going on in the lands. There are extensive player owned towns and an appearance here and there of Lord British (Richard Garriott’s character), but like Ultima Online before, the one thing sort of missing appears to be a general purpose behind what’s going on in the adventure. It might be there under the surface, but it’s not obvious enough to someone just starting the game. For the most part, when starting the game, you’re told that the Oracle (kind of like a benevolent-sounding Guardian from before) wants you to somehow unite the concepts of love, truth and courage (which were the foundations of the original eight virtues). As for why, I’m still trying to figure that out. And what happens after that, still kind of confused. I’m going to be really disappointed if we discover after all of this preparing and adventuring that we were really trying to figure out where Lord British left his car keys.

The combat mechanics are pretty decent and quite extensive, if one takes the time and effort to learn them. The game can be played on a simplistic level, but there are decks involved in the combat skills, so you can start to develop some really complicated types of maneuvers. There is also quite a bit of involvement with the crafting system as well.

The player housing is pretty awesome as well. As this was a huge part of Ultima Online, I would have been shocked if this was not the case. It’s a bit expensive, but judging from the conversations on the official boards, there may be some effort to make the land choices a bit more achievable for the common player. I’ll admit I’ve probably spent way more money than I should have playing this game, but I’m not the typical player; I do stupid things like that. Most people are generally a lot smarter than I am when it comes to that sort of stuff.

Where the game really needs to grow is in attracting players to run around in that world. They’ve done the one right thing by offering a free access sort of pass to players exploring the game, but a lot more needs to be done to get those same players to want to stay. Right now, the initial price to play the game after visiting is $40. That’s the price of a general AAA game that’s just been released. Although that price can sometimes go up to about $50, the $40 price tag is still pretty close to what people generally remember paying for a newly released PC game. And yes, the game was just released, but it is still showing a lot of early growing pains that may take many months to fix. Those are the kinds of problems people are going to see when visiting the game for free, so this might make it really difficult to translate into full members of the game itself. As long as housing is costing people over $100 in real money, people are probably going to avoid this game like the plague. Add to that the majority of the negative feedback for the game has been about the price of transactions in the game, and you have a recipe for why this might be a difficult sell.

One other problem that hasn’t been addressed all that well is another positive feature of the game: The single player game built within the game itself. You don’t have to play the game online. You can actually start the game as a single player and enjoy pretty much the same world. Without other people. The obvious negative to that is no one else is playing with you, but the positives are numerous, including three npcs that become your partners and experience the world with you, so you’re not always under powered by being alone. But like I said, they haven’t given this avenue enough attention because there are some blatantly missing things, such as player owned towns. On the surface that makes sense, but in reality, those player owned towns are often used for reasons other than housing. A lot of the connections to other zones come from linkage people have made tying numerous towns together (like carriages, balloons and boats). If no player owned towns exist, those connections just don’t exist. Which means there are islands throughout the game that have no ability to be reached because no player connection was made beforehand. So, it’s just eye candy real estate in the game where you can never visit.

As I said before, it’s easy to come up with things to complain about in pretty much any game. It’s no different in this one. Which bothers me a lot because there’s so much strong potential with the game. There are times when it can be a lot of fun. We just need to find better ways to get more people to experience that fun without the costly aftertaste.

Overall, it has a lot of potential but can easily defeat itself by letting these types of problems fester longer than they need to. Unfortunately, online devs are historically really slow at addressing these kinds of things, or in addressing them at all. And once the game starts to go in the down direction, the spiral doesn’t end until the game is gone or a shadow of its original self.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 718

The Problems of a Young People’s Movement

Business, Education, News, Politics, Social Networking, , , , , , ,

Recently, there’s been a lot of attention being paid to a group of high school students who were survivors of a horrific gun attack in Florida. While they’re not the first students to suffer from such a crappy situation, what made this tragedy even more significant was that the students didn’t remain the backdrop of the event but have now taken front stage and are literally the movement itself.

This has resulted in a number of unexpected outcomes. First, the “usual” response of “this isn’t the time” to discuss gun violence was completely drowned out by the survivors themselves who refused to allow pro-NRA pundits to dictate the terms of the conversation. And the opposite side, the political operatives who have been screaming into the wind for decades about gun violence, were also taken a bit by surprise because as much as they have wanted to do so, they’re not dictating the message but having to listen alongside everyone else who is seeing this dynamic group of young people demand and focus attention.

And this is part of the problem that I fear because as Mancur Olson pointed out in “The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups” (1965) and reinforced by Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward in “Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail” (1977), getting a movement started is a lot easier than sustaining one over time. The reasons are varied, but there’s both a free rider problem (people think others will do the work for them so they sit out the movement, convinced someone else will take up the slack) and an age problem, which I’ll talk about it a moment here.

The first problem is not easily overcome. People organize because of personal motivations, and they quite often are faced with the belief that they’re climbing a mountain that has no footing. When they realize there’s a group of others with similar goals, they become motivated and feel the sense of belonging that makes them put themselves out there for hopes of a solution. What can often happen is that solidarity may actually lead to a limited success because their opposition is also overwhelmed by the numbers gathered in such a short amount of time. So, they go home, armed with the knowledge that they succeeded. But they don’t often get everything they wanted, so when they take to the streets again to achieve the rest, they find that a fraction of their comrades appear the second time around due to that pesky free rider problem.

Which brings me to the second problem: age. One of the advantages of the current movement is also its biggest liability: Children eventually stop being children. Right now, young high school students are rallied around the idea of wanting to fix things for the youth of America. But there’s a time stamp on how effective they are going to be because of the fact that once they stop being high school students and are then perceived to be adults, their message practically disappears overnight. People tend to care when children are affected, but when those children grow up into adulthood, it’s amazing how society quickly turns their backs on those same people.

Which means, if anything is going to happen, it’s going to have to happen really soon. The NRA, conservatives and those who like the status quo are very, very good at kicking cans down the road. This is kind of the origin of the phrase “thoughts and prayers”. The term “thoughts and prayers” has only recently been debunked to reveal it means “we’re not going to do anything about this now, so all we’re willing to do is pretend we’re thinking about it, but we’re not.” Historically, they’ve been really good at ignoring huge calamities with infamous responses of “now’s not the time” and all sorts of other bags of wind, knee jerk reactions. Therefore, if anything is going to happen, it’s going to have to happen during the next few weeks, or at least before the next atrocious event occurs because once the next geographically named event occurs, Florida will be yesterday’s news, and those who want to do nothing will breathe a sign of relief that they never actually had to do anything to make things better.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 662

The Hidden Ramifications of the #metoo Movement and the “Funnel of Male Response”

News, Politics, Relationships, , , , , , , , , , ,

Yesterday, Rob Porter, a top White House aid, resigned from his position due to allegations that he abused his former wives. So far, Chief of Staff John Kelly has mistakenly thrown his political clout into defending Porter, and conservatives are starting to feel the negative effects of having stood behind an abusive person for so long (and even after discovering the revelation of abuse). What’s interesting to me is what no one seems to have really noticed: The response has been the same response we’ve always gotten, but the results are turning out to be completely different.

That needs a bit of unpacking, specifically to explain what it is I’m talking about. The reason for that is people want so badly to turn this into a partisan issue because it looks so good as one to people who might benefit. But in reality, it’s anything but a partisan issue. It’s one of gender.

And that’s something that a lot of men don’t really want to talk about. So, let me explain.

In the past, when allegations come forward about a man abusing a woman, it’s had to make its way through a really weird news cycle I like to call “the Funnel of Male Response.” Men have historically held the reins of power in both government and news media, so when a woman made a claim of abuse, there was always a male decision maker who either had to decide whether or not to run with the story, or to respond to it legally or politically. Whether through backroom deals, collusion, or straight out incompetence, the issue was often ignored or given so little attention that it was like there wasn’t a complaint made in the first place.

In a really interesting tweet from Emma Evans, she points out that her mother needed her father’s permission to open a checking account and his permission to keep her checking account after they were married, even though she actually worked at a bank herself. So, just one generation ago, a spouse of a man pretty much had no permission to conduct business in society without the direction of a patriarchal figure.

Fast-forward to today, and you start to see why a woman being abused by her husband is probably getting very little attention from a very male-dominated media and male-dominated political environment. Using that “Funnel of Male Response”, think about how practically every political issue involving violence against women has been handled in local, state and national government. First, there’s a claim of a male having done something abhorrent to or towards a woman. And then the male response is almost always one coaxed in the blanket of how it affects that specific male rather than the woman who made the claim. How many times did we hear a male politician say something like, “I have daughters, so I wouldn’t want that sort of thing to happen to them”, “I would never want to see that happen to a woman I love,” or “As a father or husband, we must enact this legislation to make sure this sort of thing doesn’t happen to women.” Basically, the commiseration in most of these cases or types is that a male patriarchal figure is responding as a male effected because of his proximity or relations to women.

This is why when we hear a response from John Kelly, stating “I can’t say enough good things about him” and urged Porter to remain in his position, we’re hearing the kind of response we typically hear about these types of circumstances. Senator Orin Hatch kind of sums up the problem by his own responses to this story in which he started out defending Porter (and calling the accusers “character assassins”) before realizing the political ramifications of being on the wrong side of this issue and then started talking about how such behavior is not acceptable, if it happened.

And that sums up the majority of the responses we’ve been getting from most other political allies of Porter. After the “#MeToo” movement, there was a call to believe female complainers and to support them going forward, but as expected, the response has been to go the direction we’ve always gone, and that’s to play the “they need to prove their accusations” before we’re willing to state any sense of belief. And then, as if by script, once enough evidence is given, the powers that be will “accept” the punishment that comes and almost always there’s no approach to somehow change the environment so such a circumstance never happens again.

Which brings me back to pointing out why this problem is pervasive and almost immutable. Our society has not evolved enough to push beyond the rationalization that men still think the world revolves around them. Hell, I’m a guy, and even I realize that sometimes I fall into that sense without even realizing I have. One thing that has been so wonderful about the #MeToo movement is that it is sometimes silencing the male response and even eliminating the Funnel of Male Response in such a way that the usual mechanism of schema that men tend to rely upon don’t even get the opportunity to interject into a conversation. So, instead of a male directed approach of dealing with how Harvey Weinstein is just a symptom of a bigger problem, a wave of firings happened instead, so that Weinstein has been completely powerless in his ability to respond, which is EXACTLY the opposite of the circumstances that he used to “allegedly” cause the problems he did that ruined his life and career. What the #MeToo movement has done is provide rapid speed in responding to allegations that used to have a filter that could never be removed.

And yes, it’s going to cause problems for a lot of men who will probably get swept up in the movement to provide a new sense of accountability. But hopefully, once the first wave of this has run its course, a correction will take place, and then through punctuated equilibrium, we will achieve a new, level playing field where such atrocities against women are ever allowed to take place. For me, that is what I hope will be the true ramifications. Unfortunately, I suspect the actual ramifications will be male blow back where things sort of go back to the previous status quo again because people who have the power aren’t usually all that generous in giving it up, even if it is exactly the right thing to do.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 651

Why Twitter Should Be Seen As A Complete Failure

Business, Relationships, Social Networking, , , , ,
Joshua had a few things he needed to say

As much as it saddens me to say this, I’m more and more convinced every day that Twitter has failed as the communication vehicle it originally set out to be. You see, the original idea for Twitter was that it was going to create an atmosphere where people could communicate with lots of people AND as a result, give those people an opportunity to communicate back. Whereas television, radio and rallies tended to present one sided conversations, Twitter was going to offer the opportunity for the channel to go back and forth. Granted, it would be mostly pointed out from the person being followed, but that feedback was an essential part of the dynamic.

Fast-forward a few years, and what we have is a social networking system that has become mostly one-sided. For an absurd example, but one that points out the problem first-hand, look at the account of Kim Kardashian West. She has 58.4 million followers. But more significantly, she follows exactly 131 people. While she does retweet people from time to time, the chances of actually getting a specific reply from her are about as likely as getting a date with Taylor Swift (translation: not likely). If you look at the most retweeted account, that of our current president, it’s interesting to note that he is followed by 47 million and only follows 45 accounts. If you look through some of the most popular accounts on Twitter, you see something very similar to just that.

What this means is that Twitter is not a communication process but a megaphone for people who are popular entities already. Some entrepreneur still needs to invent the process for people to actually have a voice in conversation with others, but Twitter is not it. If you look at the average account, people tend to have at most 100 followers and generally follow a few more than that.

The moral to this story is that quite often people follow the individuals they respect because they wish to interact with that person. But Twitter doesn’t really make that a part of its process, even though it often acts like that’s exactly what is supposed to happen. An example is a celebrity like William Shatner who has 2.57 million followers, follows about 500 and generally has somewhat of an adversarial relationship with anyone who would like to converse with him.

That’s not to say that there aren’t those who don’t communicate with their fans. I’ve followed Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi from Star Trek the Next Generation) for some time now, and she’s very friendly to her fan base. From time to time, she responds directly to things people say to her. But to be honest, she’s a rarity, whereas most celebrities treat it as a segment of their entourage that they allow tiny morsels of information.

Unfortunately, it’s all we got right now, but it’s so inferior to what I really wish it could be. So, that’s for someone else to invent and bring to the masses. I’ll wait.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 645

Remaining Unknown in a Viral World: Popularity, ASMR and Celebrity Status

Books, Business, Computer Games, Memoirs, News, Podcast, Politics, Relationships, Self-Publishing, Social Networking, Writing, , , , , , ,

Earlier today, I was examining the statistics on my website and realized that I have about 1.5 million hits on my site since I started it. That appears to be a lot, but then I started to think to myself that not a lot of people comment on it or send me messages based off of my web site (or its blog). So, this tells me that I seem to get a lot of traffic but apparently nothing seems to be going on with it. And yes, that opens up a lot of thought on a subject I’ll probably take up at another time (what do to with traffic when it gets to your site, as I don’t seem to be doing a whole of good with that area).

Last night, I was watching the latest episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, which is still one of my favorite police procedural types of shows. And in this episode, an Instagram star hooked up with a MMA fighter and was raped, but it turns out the whole thing had been set up by a young woman who was a follower of both of their Instagram feeds. The prosecutor mentioned that a motive for the set up was that the Instgram model had tens of thousands of followers, the MMA fighter had 2 million, and the young, geek girl had 6. Therefore, this was vengeance against the two well known Instagram stars from someone who felt that she had an important voice but no one was listening to her.

That resonated quite a bit with me because I think a lot of us who aren’t big stars often feel the same way. Not that we’re about to set up someone famous like the plot line of this story, but at the same time the realization that there are people who are seriously famous for a sex tape, or for just looking good in pictures, can be a hard thing to face when one is trying really hard to become known as well, but doesn’t  have that advantage those pseudo celebrities have.

Recently, I’ve been following a bunch of ASMR artists who I find to be very good at their craft. In case you’re not familiar with ASMR, it stands for Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response, which according to Wikipedia is “is a term used for an experience characterised by a static-like or tingling sensation on the skin that typically begins on the scalp and moves down the back of the neck and upper spine. It has been compared with auditory-tactile synesthesia.” And even with that definition, you’d be amazed (or maybe you wouldn’t) at how many news agencies just don’t understand it, which you can see when they start to make statements that suggest watching President Trump gives “ASMR tingles” or when some celebrity posts a Youtube of her just staring at the screen and the media goes ga ga over her “ASMR video.”

In reality, ASMR is difficult to achieve and very few artists succeed at it. There’s a reason that there are a few very popular ASMR artists out there, and almost none of them are celebrities known for other things.

Which brings me back to my original subject, and that’s that viral popularity has a bad habit of creating an atmosphere that wasn’t intended in the first place. For those not completely familiar with ASMR, it’s pretty easy to fall into the trap of thinking ASMR is nothing but people whispering and making sounds with inanimate objects. And that’s because a lot of it comes from doing exactly that. But it also comes from a stronger understanding of how those actions can trigger the audience into feeling something more than just simple reactions. As a result, quite a few artists sometimes push the envelope and create what I’ve started to characterize as PG-13 ASMR. What I mean by that is ASMR that is designed to arouse rather than “tingle”, and for those not initiated in what ASMR, it can be very easy to mistake one for the other.

This happens quite often because the models who do ASMR are almost always attractive. Both male and female ASMR artists are generally above average in attractiveness and in their social tools for attracting others. This should be expected because this is a video environment where an unattractive artist is going to be avoided or ignored, and an attractive one is going to cause people to click the image being presented on the Youtube reception screen. This often resonates in the comments section of their videos where the anonymous nature of the Internet can cause trolling behavior you’d expect in a darkened strip club environment. To make matters worse, a number of ASMR artists chase the elusive crown of traffic and subscriptions (people subscribe to their personal channels), which leads to a revenue stream from Youtube. This causes the perpetrators of the more adult environment to keep pushing the adult envelope and the non-sexual artists to feel the need to participate because of loss of viewer clicks.

Youtube has somewhat cracked down on this phenomenon, but has done so with broad strokes that hurts mostly the non-sexual artists because they demonetize mostly based on viewer feedback, and the business has become somewhat cutthroat with an almost mob mentality towards those who are actually trying to comply and do the right thing. As usual, those are the ones who suffer the most, whereas the ones who are crossing the line are rewarded because none of their fans are ever going to turn them in for breaking any of the rules.

Which kind of brings me full circle in what I was originally talking about, and that’s the problem of trying to achieve any level of popularity in a bread and circuses environment where controversy, sex and violence are the things that attract the largest audience. How does the unknown artist achieve notoriety in a mostly celebrity driven world? In a free market mentality, one would think that the quality rises to the top and everything else remains at the bottom. But that’s rarely the case. Quite often, celebrity status is more than enough to create buzz so that its products remain at the top and everything else is left grasping for scraps. As a writer, I find this problem emblematic in the field because some really bad celebrity fiction gets serious attention when it’s not very good and it’s written by people who have about twenty years before they’ll actually ever write anything significant (if they were to work on it full time and not just in between movies or photo shoots). But the people who put in the work in hopes of one day becoming discovered may do so their entire lives and never get a nibble beyond a table scrap thrown their way.

So, the question is: Is there a balance, or is it just not worth the effort? I’m kind of on the cusp of this myself, as I’ve been writing for most of my entire life, creating computer games that were popular but too early for the industry to ever recognize, wrote music back in the day when such music was seen as too experimental, and any number of other creative tasks that have fumbled, fizzled or just never took off. People keep saying “Just keep at it and your day will come”, but part of me wonders if it’s just a crap shoot and my time might better be spent catching up on the latest season of The Walking Dead.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 2,650

Bob Jenkins, middle manager at a Wyoming Applebee’s, is being closely watched as last male executive not accused of sexual harassment

Business, Relationships, , ,

Today, according to inside sources, Bob Jenkins, a tenured, two-year manager at an Applebee’s in Wyoming, is being closely monitored to make sure that no sexual harassment claims are made against him. As he is the last semi-senior executive of any corporation in America who has not yet been implicated on charges of lewd and inappropriate behavior towards any female member of his staff, Mr. Jenkins is being closely watched to make sure that he does not succumb to natural male tendencies.

Server Rebecca Dallison of the Applebee’s stated: “Not once has Bob attempted to fondle me, corner me in the back room alone, or stick his tongue down my throat while handling every day normal assignments. He hasn’t ever followed me to my car and made me feel completely uncomfortable in any way, shape or form.”

This newspaper was going to continue following this story, but our executives have all been implicated and fired for sexual harassment situations, leaving Dorothy, a junior reporter who has never covered a story on her own, left to man the store until appropriate personnel can be located in the future.

 

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 679

The Gender Problem: Being a Beta Male Has Always Been Seen As Bad

Education, News, Politics, Relationships, , , , , , , , , , ,
My ivory tower where the world actually makes sense to me

There’s a current dilemma going on right now that seems to have origins dating way back in time, but for bizarre reasons, people are convinced the problem has only recently emerged. The problem stems from revelations that Harvey Weinstein ruled his Hollywood perch by forcing women into sexual relations with him without women’s consent. It comes from our current president bragging about grabbing women in sensitive off-limits areas and referring to it as “locker room talk”. It comes from politicians running for office, oblivious to the fact that dating 14 year old girls and then demanding those girls be tried for the crime of not reporting this crime until years later is not all that cool. Anyway, the dilemma is caused from men being called out for these types of things, including catcalling, sexual discrimination, hostile work environments and no end of other horrible circumstances. But what it really stems from is a sense of cognitive dissonance (ignoring) these things for so many years and then just casting such things off as “oh well, boys will be boys.”

But there’s no lack of conversation of this dilemma going on right now. Everyone is talking about it. But what’s lacking is a discussion about why this behavior is so prevalent, and, even more important, why it’s probably never going away.

You see, our society has done a miraculous job at making sure that guys who don’t participate in the one-sided sexual politics against women have been basically neutered or removed from the equation in any way whatsoever. We even have terms for guys who aren’t participating in this behavior. Guys call them “emasculated” or “pussy-whipped”. Women don’t call them at all; they’re basically invisible to the female half of the species.

Historically, we have called them “beta” males, and with that designation comes all sorts of negative connotations. Every dating site appeals specifically to the “alpha” male, specifically a guy who is aggressive, take charge and one who leads the pack (whatever that means). The “beta” male is seen as the follower, the one who makes room for the aggressive male and most often is seen as the “friend” to a woman rather than the potential mate. Having said that, there are those who argue that this isn’t the fate of a “beta” male, but way too often it becomes exactly that. And that’s mainly because of societal expectations and norms.

Think about it. You don’t see self-help books for guys that help them to embrace their “beta” side. Instead, what you see are all sorts of crap about how to best be an “alpha” male, the guy who gets the girl, the guy who gets the job, the guy who gets, well, pretty much everything that the “beta” male guy will never get. Instead, we get dating books with advice from guys who argue that it’s better to make your move and apologize after than to do nothing and never get the opportunity in the first place.

And that’s where we are right now. “Alpha” males have gotten themselves into serious trouble with society because they felt it was acceptable to do all sorts of sexual behavior that favors dominance and control from the male perspective. Women have been seen as something to be conquered, and thus, the ramifications have always been a) conquer and win, or b) fail to conquer and lose. We have so incorporated this behavior into our societal norms that when we challenge those behaviors we’re seen as sending misleading signals, and thus, doing the wrong thing by questioning such actions in the first place.

We’ve been doing it so long now that we have started to make arguments that it’s basically in our nature, that what is happening is because of anthropology, not psychology. If women don’t like it, then the argument is that they shouldn’t have rewarded it in the first place.

But we never gave any other option a chance. Equality has never been a part of our social fabric. Ever. When women were given the right to vote, we argued for it because it would allow them to address fundamentally female issues, like health care and children. Hell, in some cases we even argued that “feelings” come from the female side of the audience, like every man is some kind of binary computer algorithm.

But think about that last paragraph for a second. How many people even questioned the terminology of “women were given the right to vote”? Why should that have EVER been a choice given to men as to whether or not women were authorized to make democratic decisions for themselves? Yet, that’s a decision we only made about a hundred years ago. It’s not like we’ve had centuries since then to see how much more we might have evolved. On the grand scale of time, we made that decision ten minutes ago. We’ve been thinking that way for about as long as we’ve been able to think. Even now we’re still nowhere near where we should have been in the beginning. And we justify not making any further strides for all sorts of reasons, including history, tradition, science, religion, hatred and racism.

Which brings me to the original point I was trying to make because yes, I will admit it. I’m a beta male, and I’ve always been one. Over the years I’ve been humiliated, talked down to, laughed at, dismissed, looked past, friend-zoned, threatened and ignored. What’s interesting about this dilemma is that this attitude is one that a future male species appears to be heading towards if we’re ever going to see gender equality, but I suspect that we’re so very far away from achieving this that comfortable acceptance of this status is not going to be in our lifetimes.

So, expect this conversation to continue as it has for many years to come. Hollywood won’t be cleaned up with the alienation of a few producers and actors. Politicians won’t clean up their ways with a few of their numbers being sidelined. Expect to see these same people re-emerge as comeback stories and overcoming past indiscretions (but changing nothing but the optics); we’re really, really good at wanting to forgive people who used to be in our corner, even if they’ve done nothing to deserve such forgiveness. And if you’re ever looking for a reason why none of this will ever change, THAT alone is the reason. As long as there are Weiners, Bill Clintons, Roy Moores, Jerry Falwells, Mel Gibsons, Woody Allens, Kevin Spaceys, Ubers, Trumps, Thomas’s, etc., we’re never changing our ways.

And if you looked at ANY of those names and thought “I agree with one of those but not one of the others,” then you’re the reason why.

Has Been Viewed (since August 20, 2021): 699