Category Archives: Uncategorized

Cell Phone Companies in the US Really Suck

Just yesterday, AT&T attempted to (and may have succeeded in) buying T Mobile. Now, personally, this really doesn’t affect me as I don’t have a T-Mobile account. I do have an AT&T account, but as AT&T is doing the buying, and not being bought, it’s not that big a deal to me. However, an inner sense in me tells me that I should be concerned because yet another cell phone provider is gone, taken over by one of the big ones that means less competition and fewer choices for us in the long run.

Some years ago, I was in South Korea, and I had a pretty good cell phone (even though it was pretty hard to understand half of the texts that would come through on it, so I never knew if it was someone from work or someone trying to sell me sex over the phone). The amount I paid per month was minimal, and the coverage was excellent. Sadly enough, I can’t say the same about the amount I pay here, nor can I say very good things about the coverage. Let me explain.

I have been with AT&T since they first got hold of the iPhone. When I first started with them, the coverage was atrociously awful. My phone dropped calls nonstop, and for someone who doesn’t get very many phone calls as it is, that’s extremely problematic. But eventually, it got better, but the pricing never did. It’s like they’re offering a luxury service at luxury prices when in reality they’re offering me something that’s essentially nothing more than a phone. Yes, a phone. Not a teleportation device. Not a phaser or a device that provides me with access to continous sex (or religion for those of you who don’t like the idea of instant access to sex). This is not a luxury item. Yet our cell phone companies act like they’re offering the greatest thing since sliced bread, but I’ll let you in on a little secret: Sliced bread was pretty damn great, and nothing’s really come along since that’s better. The pricing for cell phones is horrible, and that’s something that never seems to get better.

In other countries, they get decent cell phone packages at really good prices. The phone networks are also a lot more stable. And to top it off, they’re built on really powerful cell phone networks that don’t feel like they’ve been established with duct tape and string. The whole 4G thing is probably the straw that should have destroyed many backs of camels a long time ago. Instead of just telling us that they haven’t really produced anything all that great, cell phone companies tell us that they have “4G” coverage, when in reality it’s 3G coverage but designed so that it doesn’t fail as much. Sprint is the one provider that actually has a real 4G network, and I’ll let you in on a little secret I’ve discovered recently. They can’t seem to handle their 3G service in some areas, like where I live in Grand Rapids. Every time I have gone in to complain about lousy cell phone service, a clerk tells me something along the lines of “Yeah, we know about it, but I’ve been told they’re working on it.” Kind of like the government is working on the War on Poverty, right? Working on something, and FIXING something are two different things. Unfortunately, no one seems to get that.

What we really need is a brand new communicator technology that does away with cell phones completely and ends the monopolies that these companies have over our communication network infrastructure. It would be so much nicer if a brand new company came along and offered us something of serious value and put these cell phone companies completely out of business. Of course, I can imagine that these parasites will jump in before that ever happens and claim some weird patent was already filed that reads something like: “Patent covering any technology that actually communicates better than cell phones” and causes our legislators to side against us like they usually do whenever it comes to an argument of big business versus real people.

That’s really all I have to say on the subject. I need to take my medication now. [ /end ridiculous rant]

It’s Amazing How Many Products Have High Fructose Corn Syrup in Them

She's pretty and she's eating it, so it has to be healthy, right?

I recently changed my eating habits completely, cutting out any variation of high fructose corn syrup from my diet. Now, this isn’t a post to argue the merits or deficiencies of HFCS but just to point out how hard it is to cut it out if you decide that’s something you want to do.

Some years ago, Bill Maher had an interview with two legislators and some actor/commedian (or whatever the other person was), and they were talking about high fructose corn syrup. Maher was on his kick about how bad the stuff is for you, and the two legislators (one congressman and one senator, both from opposite parties) couldn’t bring themselves to critique it AT ALL. It was so obvious that both of them were so beholden to the corn lobby that nothing that was said during this interview even gave them the ability to say anything bad about it. Maher would talk about how it was contributing massively to obesity, and both of them responded with talking points about how great farmers are. It was surreal and almost too hard to even believe.

Fastforward a couple of years, and I’ve actually been trying to cut it out of my diet completely. First thing I did was go through my refrigerator and cupboards, looking for everything that had it in it. The obvious stuff, like candy, chips and all that kind of stuff, were easy to spot. Then I found it in stuff like Spaghetti O’s. So those went into the trash can, too. Went through the fridge and found it in strawberry jelly. Found it in pudding. Then I found it in Heinz ketchup. Swish; it went into the trash can as well.

The freezer found a few items that found their way to the trash can as well. Discovered marshmellow treats had it in it. Lost those.

The next day, I went out for groceries, and wow, it was in everything. Had to buy a different type of ketchup as Heinz had nothing but HFCS in all of the choices I could find. Ended up with Hunts Ketchup instead. Jelly was a nightmare to find something without HFCS in it. Every choice I looked at had it in it, unless I bought diet, and that then meant buying a product with aspartame (another argument completely). Then I actually found a brand that advertised that it had none in it. It used actual sugar.

Frozen foods were a problem. One of my favorite sets of frozen meals is made by Boston Market. Discovered their frozen food contains HFCS. Couldn’t buy any of my favorite dishes. Ran down the aisle and found a few other items I used to like to buy. Couldn’t buy those either. Ended up buying nothing in the frozen food aisle. Figured I’d have to start living on sandwiches.

As for sandwiches, discovered that a LOT of bread contains HFCS in it. So, finally found a brand called Aunt Sallie’s or something like that. Almost didn’t buy it because I once dated a girl named Sally who was kind of crazy. When we broke up, she sent me an itemized bill for $300, saying I owed her that much for everything she ever bought during our relationship, so I paid it and figured it was a bargain to actually get rid of her before she came back at me with a knife. Did I mention she was crazy? Anyway, bought a loaf of bread of the crazy ex-girlfriend’s brand that advertised no HFCS in it. Tasted like dirt. So a few days later had to go back to the store and buy another type of wheat bread from the same company (and threw the previous loaf of bread in the trash as there was no way I’d ever eat through that loaf of dirty-tasting bread). Fortunately, the second choice of bread I bought was much better tasting (and had no HFCS in it).

I’m still making the mistake of buying aspartame products, and even though I’m debating just turning to water products only, I haven’t made that sacrifice yet. It’s not about trying to lose weight, as my weight is fine, but just getting rid of specific things that are harming my body. I’m just not ready to lose my continuous supply of diet Dr Pepper.

So, that’s been my adventure in getting rid of HFCS products. It turned out to be a lot tougher than I imagined. At work, I used to eat french fries with my meals, but unfortunately the only ketchup available is Heinz, which definitely has HFCS, so I’ve switched to a BBQ potato chip that, according to the ingredients, doesn’t seem as harmful as what I have been eating. The real unfortunate thing is that I can no longer eat at any random fast food place because it’s really hard to tell what exactly is in the products they sell. I went to a couple of their web sites, and even though they claim to give their nutritional information, some of their reporting appears inconclusive, lacking in full disclosure and dubious at best. Therefore, I have to pretty much prepare everything I eat these days in order to not be fooled into purchasing and eating more harmful HFCS crap that they use because it’s much cheaper (and they don’t care one iota about their customers, no matter how much PR they use to pretend they do).

So, that’s my story, and hopefully I’ll live to tell more.

The News is Filled with Nothing But Crap These Days…An Analysis

I was checking out the news today when it started to dawn on me how much of our news is just crap masquerading as news. So I decided it would be fun to point out the stories that seem to be generating lots of buzz, and then point out why it’s doing nothing but wasting our time. Part of the problem is that we switched to a 24 hour news cycle, but because there really isn’t 24 hours worth of news, we get lots of garbage that tends to just overwhelm us with mediocrity. And then a bunch of pundits, or housewives (like the View) will get together and start commenting on stupid stories as if they’re somehow relevant.

Here’s my line-up for today:

1. Emanuel Elected Chicago Mayor. Why is this included in my list? Because it was conclusive the moment he was given the nod to run that he was going to win. It’s like announcing that Obama is going to be president for the next two years. We know that. It’s not a newsbreaking story. It’s just something that’s happening because nothing else could have happened. What’s truly significant about Emanuel is what happens after, when the people of Chicago start to realize that they got a Washington-insider who is looking to pad his own portfolio and really doesn’t care one iota about people from Chicago. It’s a stepping stone for him to higher office, and everyone knows it. This falls into my “why do we give power to insignificant people” folder, which grows larger every year. Too many irrelevant people are put into positions of power because they know the right people, have enough money or just are so corrupt that people mistake that for competence. In the end, I predict lots of scandals, lots of corruption and headache news coming out of Chicago once things start moving as they normally move in Chicago. And no matter how many bad things happen, a core group of people will say he was a great leader and recommend him for governor or president. That’s politics.

2. Justin Bieber got a haircut. Really? This was on the front page of CNN’s site as a highlighted story? Really? I shaved this morning. Why didn’t I get a nod from CNN? I have to share this though. The other day, I was in Meijer looking through the posters they sell, and there were at least ten of Justin Bieber. One of them had me laughing hysterically for about half an hour. It showed Bieber in a leather jacket, acting tough, and all I could do was laugh nonstop. I think some woman grabbed her daughter and shuffled her away from me, and possibly Homeland Security was alerted, meaning I can’t fly on domestic flights anymore, but I couldn’t stop laughing. He’s a freaking teen kid who looks like Opie from The Andry Griffith Show. He’s about as tough as my stuffed animal Brucoe. Actually, I apologize as Brucoe is growling at me now, as he doesn’t like to be compared to Opie…I mean Bieber.

3. Alyssa Milano is pregnant. As are a whole bunch of other movie stars, tv stars, singers, musicians, muppets and whatever. Not a real story. Somewhere down the line, we started to go into the personal lives of celebrities and report on them as if they’re really news stories. They’re not. It’s all entertainment fodder that slowly replaces actual news. It’s one thing when a story like this one is reported by People Magazine (which is where I pulled the source citation). However, every major news outlet reports it as news as well, often linking to the People Magazine story, like CNN and Fox News are both doing. I could trace it up through a number of other major news outlets, but why waste the time? We know they all seem to be doing it these days.
Some years ago, we used to have little reports here and there about celebrities, but it was usually a side pack to an actual revelation, like a new movie was coming out, or someone was going to be starting a new television series. Now, we get nonstop coverage of Jessica Alba’s “baby bump”. Personally, I’d like to find and kill the person who invented the “baby bump” term, because it annoys the crap out of me. Somewhere, somehow, someone got the idea that talking about some star’s pregnancy is really significant information for the rest of us to know. It’s not. Some movie star’s future kid is an irrelevant story unless we know for certain that child is going to grow up to be a major celebrity himself/herself. Which brings me to the update of the day on certain implosive stars, like Charlie Sheen, Mel Gibson and Lindsay Lohan. If they’re making a new movie, television show, or saving a specific rain forest, it’s a story. If they’re yelling at a concierge in a French hotel, it’s NOT a story. Or it never should be.
I’m sorry I have to point this out again, but I will, because someone is going to criticize me with exactly this argument: “But I like stories about celebrities.” That’s fine. They should be reported in gossip papers, not the national news as a newsbreaking story that gets pushed across the bottom of the screen while people are rioting in Egypt. That had to be the saddest commentary of all time when victorious revolutionists overthrew Mubarak, there was a news ticker going across the screen revealing the breaking news story that Paris Hilton was thinking about shopping for an engagement ring. Talk about destroying the impact of a world-changing event. I mean, years from now Paris Hilton is going to be forever scarred because when she was thinking of buying an engagement ring for a marriage that may or may not happen, she had to have it disrupted by a whole bunch of Egyptians overthrowing the oppressive regime of a dictator who only days ago ordered all of their deaths for disobeying him. That poor girl.
4. Lindsay Lohan is going back to court…and might wear a cute dress when she goes back to court. Okay, that’s important. I have no complaints here.
5. Ex-Aide slams Sarah Palin. Who cares? Tells us absolutely nothing new but fuels a news machine that loves to print things about Sarah Palin, who is a non-entity in real politics. She has zero chance of any electivity in this country and serves as a joke to the American political system. She has absolutely no significance, importance or relevance to anything whatsoever. Yet, every news cycle seems to need to print more information about her that has no further relevance than the last crap that was printed or broadcasted.
This week hasn’t been as bad as some other weeks, but that’s all I really have for the stories that probably shouldn’t be taking up our time. However, I’d like to talk about some stories that I think are important:
1. Libya. The continuous spread of the wave of democracy has now touched on Libya and is about to splash down there. Unlike Egypt, Libya has no US presence or any type of pressure from western countries to stop it from doing what it does. As a matter of fact, unlike Egypt, Libya has more control over the west than the west has over it, mainly because western countries will support this dictator to the very end in the hopes of not losing its constant flow of oil that comes from Libya. Somewhere down the line, as things get really bad, the western countries are going to have to make an important choice to either stand behind democracy or stand behind the dictator. Unfortunately, our track record on these types of events is not good, and Obama hasn’t proven to be any different than any other previous president before him.
2. Egypt. So far, everything has gone right for the democracy movement. The army has stood behind the protesters and is doing all of the right things. Like any good movie, I suspect some twist is only around the corner about to happen, so we should be ready for any jerking movement that should happen in the near future, like the army suddenly deciding to go back on promises, or revolutionaries doing something stupid based on unsubstantiated bravado. Hopefully, everything will keep going right, but we know how the real world tends to work.
3. Wisconsin. The fight of unions against government is playing out in Wisconsin as I write this. No one knows how it is going to turn out, but things are getting pretty bad for all of the actors involved. This is an important story and should be the focus of pretty much everyone.
4. The Budget Show Down. Most people aren’t really paying attention, but the whole future of our country is being argued on a daily basis between Republicans and Democrats, and they’re heading towards a shut down of the US government because neither side can get along. This is massively important, and much like a North and South Korea stalemate, our two sides are not budging. The victims in the end will be the American people, and to be honest, I don’t think the political actors really care because they both realize that the American people are still stuck with two choices: Them. Therefore, there’s no belief that any negative fallout will occur (at least not to them). If our nation shuts down, that should be a sign to the American people how little the people who run our government really cares about the people who make up the citizenry of this government. But unfortunately, no one will notice, and the fights will continue because we’re often way too stupid to realize when we’re being played and when we’re being played with.
Those are a few stories that should receive the most attention. Sadly, they won’t, and by the time we end up in an election cycle, we’ll be arguing about someone’s comments on abortion, an irrelevant celebrity’s comments on some half-relevant issue, or something completely innane and unimportant.

Revisiting Old Computer Games

Over the last weekend, I was taking a break from writing, and I found myself looking for a computer game to play. I was already tired of the current crop of games out there, so I was looking for something new, different, or just not the same old game. So I went onto Steam’s site, looking for a game to download, and that’s when I came across an old gem of a game I played the crap out of in the day. It was a game called Space Rangers 2.

Space Rangers 2 is a weird, quirky game, which is about the best way to describe it. It takes place in the year 3300, or something like that, and the galaxy is pretty much ours to explore. You play a space ranger who has been recruited to the, oh I don’t know, the space rangers? and it is your job to pretty much do whatever it is you want to do, and you get paid to do it. You run around space either doing good, doing evil, doing errands, or just doing stupid things. It’s really your choice. In the end, you fight a race of computers called The Dominators, and as you get more powerful and stronger, you wage better war against them. It’s that sort of game.

The interesting thing about the game, aside from the usual playability, is that it was created by the Russians. So it’s an import, and it’s not the best import ever either, which adds a bit of flavor to the game. There’s some voice acting to it (very little) and it sounds like someone trying to not sound like Arnold Schwarzeneger. The writing is actually pretty good, but the translation is sometimes absurd. There are word text games in the mix, so whenever you end up with one of those, it’s a crapshoot as to whether or not you can complete the mission because sometimes the answers you have to give just don’t make any logical sense. There’s one mathematical puzzle that sounds something like: “Hey, you space ranger guy, you needs to tells me the answer to the question some that I tell you so that kind of you know sound like a fifteen that takes the eighteen for the hopscotch ritual. So which has you? A. 254, B. 738, C. The Continent of Praxmire, D. Yodeling. Answer correctly or we kills you!” You probably get the idea that sometimes “quirky” is a kind word.

But the game is fun. I played it all weekend long until I just exhausted myself and had to go to bed at night. And then I’d start playing it again in the morning.

So, there’s something to be said for some of those old games. I just wish I could find more of them that are just as fun to play as that one has been.

How Do You Fix the Problems of Race in America?

I’m going to talk about a subject that no one wants to talk about, mainly because to do so automatically causes the person talking about it to be perceived as either a racist or clueless.

I was watching an science fiction show from the BBC (British Broadcasting Channel), and something kept striking me as odd, but I really couldn’t put my finger on it. The show was about some frumpy woman reporter who solves science fiction mysteries with a couple of neighborhood kids, which happen to be about three or four high school youths who bounce back and forth as to which ones are the main characters at any one time. One of the main characters of the kids is a young black man, who plays one of the centered character’s best friends. As I continued watching this show, it started to remind me of a previous season of Doctor Who (the new ones broadcast over the last few years), and I realized that there had been a central black male character who played an off and on love interest for the main female partner of the Doctor. It was when I thought about these two characters that I started to realize what was wrong. It took only a few American shows on television for me to realize exactly what that was.

Let me explain by first pointing out what is so significant about these two black characters on both of these shows: Not once was I ever reminded that they were actually black. The parts they were playing could have been played by anyone of pretty much any race or ethnicity. They fit in so well with the fictional dynamic that I started to think that perhaps they were creating some kind of weird fantasy in Great Britain. And then I started to understand that these characters represented something even more fascinating: They didn’t have to “act” black in order to be black. They were accepted no differently than any other character on their respective shows.

Now, if I was to watch something like Law & Order in the US, I’m immediately shown that the one main black character is a street-talking, tough guy who fits a very strong stereotype, which not so ironically was somewhat created and prepetuated by the former hip hop/rap/whatever star who plays that particular character. As I moved from one show to another, it was very rare to find an African-American actor or any ethnically-diverse actor who was not playing to an identity that was substantiated by a whole lot of stereotypes and markers that continue to separate disparate identities from the centralized, white, middle class expectation of what is often construed as mainstream. A few anomalies do come to mind, however, like Tony Stark’s buddy in Iron Man, who represents a military colonel, not played using any obvious stereotyical constraints. Or Morgan Freeman when he plays a scientist or detective. But those are rare exceptions. Instead, I find myself seeing way too many television shows and movies where whenever there’s a call for a person of race, color or ethnicity, the part is usually played to maximum effect by revealing how diverse that individual can possibly be.

It shouldn’t go without saying that such continuous uses of identity might actually be creating serious problems for any type of reconciliation or desires for integration. During the 1960s, there was a huge battle fought for desegregation in the nation’s schools, because smart people realized that separating people by differences was going to continue to make it impossible for this melting pot of ours to ever actually start melting. But something happened that we should have figured on, but we seemed to ignore it once we won our little victory in the courts and on the school steps. We forgot that previous separation might just make it very possible for continued separation once we got people into those schools together. Having been brought up during that period of desegregation, it was not unusual for me to experience large periods of time where I lived with separation in the schools themselves. Blacks sat with blacks, whites sat with whites, and Hispanics stuck with Hispanics. There were a few cross-overs, but there needed to be more, and the institutions themselves did very little effort to actually break down those barriers. Today, they’re institutionalized, and I don’t see them breaking down any time soon.

Part of the problem is that the organizations that were formed to end the separations are now part of the continued separation today. Civil rights leaders of the past, who were instrumental in getting people to rise up and be noticed, are still fighting the same battles today, but instead of pushing for desegregation and cooperation between disparate entities, the fights usually end up being more geared towards future separation and honoring identity rather than melting identity so everyone can be cooperative and as one.

What decades of this behavior have done is set up a paradigm that I don’t think is going to easily be fixed as long as we keep going on with the same MO we’ve been using since day one. Add in socioeconomic problems, and we’re at a point where I don’t think we have any recourse but to try to fix this now or end up at a point where it can never be fixed by peaceful methods. I”m starting to fear we may already be at the saturation point as it is.

A year or so ago, I was attacked and beaten by three young black men who targeted me because I was an easy target. It has been so hard to not see this as a racial thing and to keep from painting every black male I see as a potential attacker. Since that moment, I get nervous and extremely defensive whenever I see a group of young black men walking towards me on the street. It shouldn’t be that way, but it only takes one incident of such impact to cause someone to change his natural way of thinking about things. I still find myself crossing to the other side of the street when I see a group of young black men walking towards me, and that was something I never thought about doing before.

Our society has managed to create an identity marker of race and ethnicity that is continuously perpetuated by our media and entertainment entities. Part of me thinks that by doing so, we’re also telling people of diverse race and ethnicities that it’s okay because it’s expected of them to be like the stereotypes we put forth in these channels. Yet, something tells me that if I was walking along the street in Great Britain and I came across a group of young men of a different race or ethnicity, I’d probably not have the same complications as I do here. And that tells me that we’re doing something seriously wrong here. Whether it’s due to the drug culture we’ve developed that’s tied to a gang mentality, or if it’s just a side effect of the continously divergent class distinction we have in this country where wealthier people are further and further removed from the poor, I’m not sure. But something’s seriously wrong.

Unfortunately, I don’t think anyone is actually working on making things better, but hoping that continuing to do the same things we’ve been doing will somehow improve the general picture. But that’s never going to work. We have a real race problem here in the US, and part of the reason we’re never going to solve it is because no one wants to talk about it. We have this PC spin to everything these days, and the only people talking about race are the ones who are consumed by it, which means we’re going to continue trying to solve gushing chest wounds with band-aids.

So, here are a couple of thoughts.

1. The problem needs to be addressed by everyone, not just by former civil rights leaders or sociologists who think the solution is to have government create more bureaucracy. Everyone needs to be involved in both the planning and the implementation.

2. Poverty needs to be addressed and dealt with. Too many people are struggling to survive, and whenever you have that dynamic, you have people willing to do some unruly things to gain leverage over others.

3. We need serious conversation about the drug war. It has created an element of society that should never be a part of our very foundation. Whether the solution be legalization, even stronger enforcement, or whatever, we need to get everyone involved in tackling this issue. Or it will continue to destroy us.

4. Schools need complete integration. The goal should be the elimination of race, not the celebration of it. Unfortunately, there are too many people tied to the benefits of separation and identification. That one hurdle may never be achieved, which is sad because this is probably the one hurdle that might make the biggest difference.

5. Elmo needs to be involved somehow. He always gets this right.

Why Congress Doesn’t Care if the Government Shuts Down

Congressional masseuses will still be reporting to work if government shuts down

This may come as a surprise to people, but if Congress doesn’t approve a budget, the only people who will suffer from the government shutting down are the rest of us who aren’t in Congress. Turns out that the last time the government shut down because of  a budget problem (December 16, 1995 to January 6, 1996), well, the government declared that certain sectors of the government could continue working and would continue getting paid. Guess which sectors they were. Yep. Congress and everyone who works for Congress. In other words, if they act like poffy hairdressers and decide to take their balls and go home, the only people who will suffer will be the rest of the country.

When they shut down government, they closed national parks, stopped paying for veteran services and made it impossible to obtain a passport. Also, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) stopped monitoring potential outbreaks of worrisome diseases. Turns out, Congress members are pretty much the only people who are considered important enough to keep working. And they did by doing absolutely nothing because they couldn’t get along long enough to put together a budget. So, they basically got paid for doing nothing. Kind of a comforting thought, if you think about it.

So, if Congress decides to cut off the government again, expect a lot of services you need to be shut down but any services that make those in power happy, well, they’ll still be running just fine. You might not be able to go to a national park or if you’re a veteran, you’ll probably have to hold in that desire to feel pain from a war injury that won’t be treated during this period. But if you’re a masseuse at the Congressional gymnasium, you’ll probably be expected to report to work. After all, you’re a necessity to keeping the government going during its time of need.

My Comparison of Barnes & Noble’s Nook Color vs. the Amazon Kindle 3G

"I love this book by Duane. I wonder if he's single."

I’ve owned a 3G Kindle for a few months now, and I’ve been pretty happy with it. However, being the tech junkie that I am, when I heard that Barnes & Noble was coming out with a color e-reader, the Nook, I took a quick look at it and then decided it was something I was willing to try out.

I blogged about my problems with buying it in the first place, specifically the dork who worked at Barnes & Noble who told me it could hook up to my computer and transfer my books that way (because I don’t have a wifi connection at home). Turns out he was full of crap, so I have to actually go to a place with wifi in order to download any of the purchases I make. Not a big deal, but a bit annoying when you were planning otherwise.

Right off the start, I have to say that the Nook looks really nice, especially in color. That, however, does bring a couple of deficiencies as well, specifically a very long download time, whereas the Kindle downloads almost instantaneously. Not a huge deal, but somewhat inconvenient. I’m sure if the Kindle had a color version, I’d be going through the same problems, although I have yet to try with a grayscale book on the Nook to see if that’s much faster.

The Nook is a lot heavier than the Kindle. Kind of inconvenient if you’re holding it up for a long time. Never really thought about that until I actually had to do it.

The biggest difference is in choice of content, and I’m really hoping that changes soon. The Kindle has so many choices of things to buy and download. When I bought the Nook, I was looking forward to all sorts of color books and magazines, but their selection is sparse, if almost devoid of content. There are so few magazines who have signed up with the Nook that I find myself really stretching myself to find something I actually want to download. But I wanted to at least see one, so I went with Consumer Reports, which costs $2.40 a month. It’s not bad, but to be honest, I’d never have bought it if it wasn’t the only choice of some content that I wanted to look at. That’s not a good sign when it comes to buying magazines.

My hope is that because the Nook Color is so new that more magazines are right around the corner thinking about signing up. But so far, on the “Coming Soon” list with Barnes & Noble’s Nook content, I don’t see any magazines planning a future launch. If that doesn’t change, the Nook is a doomed product.

So far, there are a few children’s titles that are in color, so if you have kids, it might be a decent purchase, if not a bit expensive. But there just aren’t enough. My hope, again, is that because it is so new that so few publishers have been pushing content to it, but are planning to do so in the future. If not, again, the Nook is doomed.

Price: The price of the Nook Color was $249. With a cover and tax, it cost me about $300. That’s a bit on the high side for me, even though I was willing to pay it just for the convenience of trying it out. Yeah, I’m kind of stupid that way. But if there is not more content released, I just bought a $300 paper weight, and that will piss me off.

The Kindle 3G is $189, and while there is a wifi version for $139, I had to buy the more expensive one because I don’t have wifi at home. For the extra $50, it was worth it. And the amount of content is wonderful. I subscribe to the Washington Post for $14.99 a month (think that’s the price), and it’s definitely worth it to receive the newspaper each and every morning. I had trouble finding this newspaper on the Nook, but others, like the New York Times are on it. Again, the selection was abysmal at best.

Break down:

Barnes & Noble Nook Color (positives)

It’s in color.

There is some unique content (through Barnes & Noble’s PubIt! program, which is a lot like Amazon’s self-publishing for the Kindle).

That’s about it.

This one goes to 11

Nook (negatives)

Heavy

Expensive ($249)

Not a lot of content available for it.

Battery life is pretty low in comparsion to the Kindle (massively low). A charge seems to last about 8-10 hours, according to their documentation. The Kindle lasts all week long and that’s with a lot of use. Again, that might have something to do with the color.

Downloads take a long time.

Kindle (positives)

Fast downloads.

Lots of content. LOTS of content.

Price is $139 (for wifi version) and $189 for (3G/Wifi version)

Lighter than the Nook.

Battery lasts a long time.

"It was the best of times...it was the worst of times...(line?)"

Kindle (negatives)

Not in color. That’s really about it.

******************************************

A final note is that even though I’ve said mostly bad things about the Nook, if they can get past the problem of lack of content, it can become a powerhouse in e-readers. Customers at Barnes & Noble appeared really interested in the product, and a friend of mine keeps talking great about it. But without increased content, especially content that uses color, it will fail horribly.

One area where it could shine, and is almost untouched, is graphic novels. If comic book companies would realize that they now have a way to present their work on an e-reader, and embrace the Nook, both could do a wonderful job in selling this to the most desirable market out there, the teenager/young adult market. But I’m fearing that Barnes & Noble has handled the e-reader in almost the same way Blockbuster handled online movie distribution against Netflix. It is doing too little too late. As long as Barnes & Noble continues to appear to always be one step behind Amazon, they’re going to fail horribly as a book company, which is a whole other issue itself. But it’s in online content and e-readers where the final battle for dominance is going to take place. If someone could go back and tell Blockbuster to embrace the mail market when it didn’t, it could have changed things so much against Netflix. That’s where we are with the e-reader market. Barnes & Noble has a chance to push ahead and dominate. But history tells me that the results will be so much different.

If we choose the wrong e-reader, North Korea wins!

I’m Getting Really Tired of Salespeople Making Shit Up

I bought a Nook Color today from Barnes & Noble, in the store itself. It cost me $250, plus another $30 for a cover, but came to about $300 including the tax. It was somewhat of an impulse buy, although I have been thinking about it for a few days now. You see, I don’t really need one. Recently, I bought an Amazon Kindle, and I can use that to read most ebooks that I want to purchase. However, I thought it would be nice to buy a color ereader for when I wanted to read magazines or maybe an occasional graphic novel.

The big problem for me was that I don’t have wifi at home. I have it at work, but I want to be able to download books at home and read them there, not have to go downtown to download my books and then come back home. The sales dude at Barnes & Noble, when I asked him about this, said, “oh, it’s easy. All you have to do is just plug it into your computer and then move the book over to the reader.”

The reason why I bought the Kindle 3g version for $189 instead of the wifi version for $139 was because of that problem. And I’ve been happy with the Kindle since.

So, I get home, set up the Nook, and sure enough I can’t even register it because I don’t have wifi. When I finally read through the tech information on the Nook Color, turns out that unless you have wifi, you can’t download anything. At all. No 3g, no using it through your computer (as the guy specifically said it could), nor any way of using brainwaves to magically make the text appear on the Nook either.

So yet again a fucking salesperson for some company decided that because he didn’t know shit about the product he was trying to sell, couldn’t just come out and say, “You know, that’s a good question. I don’t have the answer t that.” Instead, he had to make shit up and have me walk out of the store with a purchase that doesn’t do what the stupid fucker said it could do.

This is a karmic payback. I know it is because earlier, I was in Best Buy with Jason, and a whole bunch of Best Buy blue shirts kept coming up to me and asking me if I needed help. I said no. But one really cute girl wearing the Best Buy blue shirt came up to me and asked me if I needed help while looking at a Canon camera. I let her go on and even give me misleading information because she was cute and I didn’t feel like sending her away. Therefore, the karma gods have responded to my letting that one person go without revealing her for what she really was, all because she was cute.

I shall not make this error again, oh great karma gods. No salesperson shall escape my wrath ever again, no matter how cute she is. Well, unless she smiles at me and…NO, I will not stray from the path again!!!

The Fascination With Celebrities

I was reading a “top 50 reasons why you should be proud of living in New York City” and one of them had something to do with rubbing shoulders with famous people. First, I don’t live in New York City, and second, I’ve never understood the fascination with celebrities people have. I can understand liking someone because that person is a talented musician, actor, or whatever, but why care anything about their personal life? If Angelina Jolie is dating someone, who cares? It’s not like she’s going to be dating me, or anyone I know anytime soon, so why should I care? Why does anyone care?

I’ve always wondered about this focus people have on the lives of famous people. In the last decade or so, we’ve actually moved from a fascination with celebrities to a ridiculous amount of attention on non-celebrities who want to be celebrities and have become celebrities as a result. That, in itself, borders on complete insanity.

The fact is, the few times that I’ve actually hobnobbed with actual celebrities, I’ve discovered I really didn’t like them. Or they were so normal that they weren’t really all that much of celebrities to me. Yet, there is an entire industry that is fueled on this obsession with famous people.

I really don’t understand it.